
The key to a successful Midterm
Seeings as my brain is almost completely mush and I had a well deserved break coming my way, i decided to capture on camera the current bane of my existence: Evidence. While this is a worthwhile course and topic (since almost every attorney will come face to face with the rules of evidence at SOME time in their career), the needless stress that accompanies a midterm is NOT the greatest.
These are my three best buddies: the actual Evidence textbook, an Emanual Evidence outline, and my trusty Federal Rules of Evidence 2008-2009 Statutory Supplement! All three necessary to fully grasp the concepts.
When I was younger, I didn't realize that Evidence was so complicated. In fact, most of society knows that evidence is a courtroom/trial concept and to win a case, you've got to have the evidence to back it up. and what does media tell us? you find the evidence and present it during arguments!
WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
oh...
so....
wrong!
Evidence just may well be one of the more confusing courses I've taken thus far! THere are rules on what you can present, how you can present it, and exceptions. there are ALWAYS exceptions! Some of the rules make sense, like FRE 403, which may exclude evidence if it's a waste of time, among other things. and then there are some where you are just scratching your head and wondering who thought that one up! Like FRE 613(b) where extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement by a witness is NOT admissible unless the witness is afforded an opportunity to explain or deny the same and the opposite party is afforded an opportunity to interrogate the witness thereon... did I lose you?
it took me a while to understand that one. Unfortunately the test is tomorrow and I am still trying to make sure I understand every little nuance of the rules we'll be tested on! Gotta love law school!